It is difficult to ensure that a series of complex actions actually follow a set of human-written rules.
It translates human policies into machine-readable constraints and checks if a sequence of actions follows those rules.
It provides a clear way to verify that actions align with intended policies.
It was run in the sandbox and it failed. run produced no meaningful output (empty or near-empty).
$ python3 policy_graph_verifier.py ✅ Policy compliance verified
No screenshot — there is nothing working to show. This is recorded as an unfinished sketch so the attempt stays visible instead of being quietly dropped.
All of it — 112 lines, one file, standard library only.
# Policy-Graph Verifier in Python
from dataclasses import dataclass
from typing import List, Dict, Optional
import re
class PolicyGraphVerifier:
"""
Combines POC policy translation with Verigraph's graph rewriting to verify
if an action sequence satisfies a policy.
"""
@dataclass
class Constraint:
"""
Represents policy constraints from POC
"""
type: str # DIO, ZT-AAS, ICAE
expression: str
weight: float
@dataclass
class ActionNode:
"""
Represents actions in the graph
"""
id: str
action_type: str
attributes: Dict[str, str]
def __init__(self):
self.constraints = []
self.graph = [] # Type: List[ActionNode]
def compile_policy(self, policy_text: str) -> None:
"""
POC translation: convert natural language policy into constraints
"""
# Simplified POC logic - in real system this would use full POC compiler
dio_pattern = r'(must|should|shall) (execute|run|process) (in order|sequentially|synchronously)'
zt_pattern = r'(only|exclusively|per) (administrators|team leads|authorized personnel)'
icae_pattern = r'(cost|charge|expense) (attributed to|assigned to|borne by)'
if re.search(dio_pattern, policy_text, re.IGNORECASE):
self.constraints.append(self.Constraint('DIO', 'execution_order_constraint', 1.0))
if re.search(zt_pattern, policy_text, re.IGNORECASE):
self.constraints.append(self.Constraint('ZT-AAS', 'authority_check', 0.8))
if re.search(icae_pattern, policy_text, re.IGNORECASE):
self.constraints.append(self.Constraint('ICAE', 'cost_attribution', 0.7))
def build_graph(self, actions: List[Dict]) -> None:
"""
Create graph nodes from action definitions
"""
for action in actions:
node = self.ActionNode(
id=action.get('id'),
action_type=action.get('type'),
attributes=action.get('attributes', {})
)
self.graph.append(node)
def verify(self) -> bool:
"""
Apply Verigraph-style graph rewriting rules to verify constraints
"""
# Simplified graph verification - full implementation would use graph rewriting rules
for constraint in self.constraints:
if constraint.type == 'DIO':
# Check execution order constraints
if not self._has_linear_execution():
return False
elif constraint.type == 'ZT-AAS':
# Check authority attributes
if not all(
any(attr.get('authority') == 'authorized' for attr in [node.attributes for node in self.graph])
for node in self.graph
):
return False
elif constraint.type == 'ICAE':
# Check cost attribution
if not any('cost' in node.attributes for node in self.graph):
return False
return True
def _has_linear_execution(self) -> bool:
"""
Simple check for sequential execution
"""
return len(self.graph) == len(set(node.id for node in self.graph))
if __name__ == '__main__':
# Example usage
policy_verifier = PolicyGraphVerifier()
# Compile policy from text
policy_text = "Policy: All actions must be executed sequentially and only by authorized personnel."
policy_verifier.compile_policy(policy_text)
# Build graph from actions
actions = [
{'id': '1', 'type': 'process_data', 'attributes': {'authority': 'authorized'}},
{'id': '2', 'type': 'store_results', 'attributes': {'cost_center': '1234'}}
]
policy_verifier.build_graph(actions)
# Verify
if policy_verifier.verify():
print('✅ Policy compliance verified')
else:
print('❌ Policy violation detected')