It is difficult to figure out exactly which series of steps led to a specific final result. This makes it hard to trace the history of how a situation reached its current state.
It looks at a final outcome and works backward to map out the specific sequence of actions taken to get there. It prints a clear timeline of every step and the change it caused.
It provides a clear map of the path taken to reach a specific result.
It was run inside an isolated container with no network access. This is the exact command and the real output it produced — captured process output, not written by a model.
$ python3 state_path_traceability_engine.py Path to target_state: action1 --initial--> action1 action2 --state1--> action2 action3 --state2--> action3
A screenshot of that run.
A clean run proves this does what is shown above, in a CPU-only sandbox. It is a small research demo — not a production tool, and nothing here was published anywhere.
All of it — 32 lines, one file, standard library only.
# State Path Traceability Engine
class StatePathTraceabilityEngine:
def __init__(self):
self.transitions = []
def log_transition(self, from_state, action, to_state):
self.transitions.append((from_state, action, to_state))
def get_path(self, target_state):
path = []
current_state = target_state
for transition in reversed(self.transitions):
prev_state, action, next_state = transition
if next_state == current_state:
path.append((action, prev_state))
current_state = prev_state
return [(action, from_state) for from_state, action in reversed(path)]
# Example usage
if __name__ == "__main__":
engine = StatePathTraceabilityEngine()
engine.log_transition("initial", "action1", "state1")
engine.log_transition("state1", "action2", "state2")
engine.log_transition("state2", "action3", "target_state")
target = "target_state"
path = engine.get_path(target)
print(f"Path to {target}:")
for action, state in path:
print(f"{state} --{action}--> {state}")